Compare loans
EDITORIAL STANDARDS

Clear sources. Accountable content.

Standards for research, financial explanations, ratings and corrections.

Page revised 13 October 2026 · Current preview scope

Purpose and responsibility

Finoro content should help a reader understand a borrowing decision. Misleading financial figures can affect a household budget. This page records the editorial standard for the project; it is not evidence that every article has received an independent professional review.

Research and fact checking

  1. Use official provider product pages, FAQs and terms for product disclosures.
  2. Use official regulators and legislation for regulatory explanations.
  3. Record product, customer group, review date and source URL.
  4. Check conflicts between headlines, calculators and FAQs.
  5. Label unknowns; do not fill gaps with invented offers or market averages.

Different numbers need different labels

Provider figureAttribute the source, date and customer restrictions.
Finoro arithmetic exampleShow assumptions, formula and excluded charges.
User-input calculatorExplain the model and input units; results are not quotes.
Unconfirmed informationIdentify uncertainty rather than presenting a confirmed offer.
Editorial scoreShow individual points, reasons and source coverage.

Authorship, review and automation

Materials are presented under the Finoro project brand. Named authors, qualifications and independent professional reviewers have not yet been confirmed for publication. We do not imply licensed advice or first-hand borrowing experience.

Site implementation and drafting use software and may use AI assistance. Generated text, arithmetic and source summaries require factual checking and editorial responsibility. More text or more pages is not evidence of quality.

Review and correction standard

Change source-review dates only after checking the underlying information. A design edit does not establish a fresh source review. A substantiated correction should trigger checks of the affected profile, comparison table, rating and linked explanation together.

Material corrections should explain what changed on the affected page. No daily review cycle or response deadline is promised.

Send the URL and evidence to hello@finoro.co.za. See the correction checklist.

Original value and commercial separation

Paid placement must be recognisable and must not be presented as evidence for a rating. Provider descriptions should be accompanied by useful comparison work or explanation rather than copied as thin promotional content.

Do not publish invented testimonials, fake credentials, guaranteed approval claims or repeated landing pages with no additional purpose. Each page should serve its own user question.

Publication references

This approach is informed by Google’s helpful, reliable content guidance and spam policies. These inform practice; they do not certify Finoro or guarantee search rankings.